Not all survey expert witnesses are equal. Below are five key questions to ask before signing the letter of agreement. A valid and reliable survey can make all the difference to your case.
Ms. Harper completes all of the work: Case Review, Survey Design, Methodology, Questionnaire Development, Coding and Programming, Beta Testing, Fielding, Managing, Analyzing, and Report Writing. Should a unique situation arise, Ms. Harper has a network of qualified professionals from which to draw.
Many others, however, outsource virtually the entire survey to a third-party survey company. While some may help determine the methodology, many of the 'big names' just sign the report and show up to depositions and trials. Sure, they will say it was 'under their direction.'
Not only does this outsourcing practice lessen the credibility of your expert witness, it may introduce third-party questions of quality. And, of course, the survey will cost more as both companies now need to be paid.
Ms. Harper uses only the premier leading online survey platforms. They provide broad device capabilities, advanced programming, and sophisticated analytical tools.
Ms. Harper sources samples from only the leading sample houses.
Ensure that your expert witness knows where and how the sample company gets its panelists. How they incentivize them to participate. If their invited panelists respond quickly? Are their respondents who they say they are? Do their respondents have similar characteristics to the US general population? How often can their respondents participate in a survey?
Ms. Harper has completed more than 130 surveys and survey rebuttals for legal cases. She is adept at assessing and opining on likelihood of confusion, secondary meaning, genericness, and more.
Simply having a strong research background and/or education doesn't make an individual qualified to conduct surveys relevant in legal cases. Courts require very specific methodologies and practices not normal in the business world.
Federal court cases and more than half of the states use Daubert. It determines whether or not an expert’s testimony gets excluded.
The Daubert standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses’ testimony in federal court. An Expert’s Testimony or expert’s report can be challenged and excluded if it does not meet the Daubert standard. The Federal Rules of Evidence 702 states that a witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: